Antivirus Performance Comparison
Viruses are capable of a wide range of avastantivirusreview.com/how-to-maintain-transparency-in-corporate-finance-with-virtual-board-rooms things, from stealing hard disk space to access to your personal data or draining your CPU. There are a variety of anti-virus software on the market to protect your devices from such issues. It is crucial to select an anti-virus that has minimal impact on the system performance. This is a key factor that all of our antivirus programs are tested against. The results below are determined by the amount of time it takes each program to complete an operation. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free, for instance has a background effect of just 6% when running a full scan, while ESET had an effect of 12 percent.
Avira is a German-based company, has a solid reputation in our tests. It has consistently scored above 90 percent in the three categories of Protection (False positives) and Performance (False Positives) and Usability. Its UI is also user friendly and offers plenty of functions, including a clever firewall and a variety of privacy tools. Avira subscriptions are priced monthly rather than for a fixed 1-3 year period. This makes it simpler to cancel the subscription or change the terms at any time.
A fairly new name in our tests, Essentware – which was previously known as PCKeeper is a program that runs the Avira engine behind the scenes and generally scores fairly well across the board. Its performance and user interface are both easy to use however, there are a few issues with stability such as scanning jobs freezing that have led to a lower rating. The detection was excellent and a flawless run of the certification sets earned VB100.